Re: Apache Virtual Hosts
From: Rich Grise (rich_at_example.net)
Date: 12/24/04
- Next message: H. S.: "USR8054 and port redirection"
- Previous message: Rich Grise: "Re: Apache Virtual Hosts - better now! But..."
- In reply to: Davide Bianchi: "Re: Apache Virtual Hosts"
- Next in thread: Ken: "Re: Apache Virtual Hosts"
- Reply: Ken: "Re: Apache Virtual Hosts"
- Reply: Erik Aronesty: "Re: Apache Virtual Hosts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 19:51:18 GMT
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 18:54:55 +0000, Davide Bianchi wrote:
> On 2004-12-24, Rich Grise <rich@example.net> wrote:
>> First, is it even possible?
>
> Sure.
>
>> and the latest error message is:
>> [crit] (98) Sddress already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address
>> 4.11.176.232 port 80
>
> Meaning: there is already something running on port 80. Maybe
> you already have one apache or something else running.
>
> Note: if all 3 domains/sites have to point to the same document root,
> you can use just one VirtualHost and the ServerAlias directive.
>
Actually, I've got three different document roots, which was the problem.
I've read the instructions, ;-) and found out that there can be only
one domain name per IP. I guess that's what "fully-qualified" means.
Duh.
So, http://www.zoneedit.com says, "Use web forwarding". So I did.
Now, I'm working on how to get the addy window in the browser to
show the http://www.neodruid.net instead of http://www.neodruid.com:8080
and so on.
I _know_ it's either in httpd.conf comments or the other docs "somewhere" ;-)
Thanks!
Rich
- Next message: H. S.: "USR8054 and port redirection"
- Previous message: Rich Grise: "Re: Apache Virtual Hosts - better now! But..."
- In reply to: Davide Bianchi: "Re: Apache Virtual Hosts"
- Next in thread: Ken: "Re: Apache Virtual Hosts"
- Reply: Ken: "Re: Apache Virtual Hosts"
- Reply: Erik Aronesty: "Re: Apache Virtual Hosts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|