Re: OT: Safe Riddles
From: Pip (Aetyr_at_nc.rr.com)
Date: 01/07/05
- Next message: Phoenix: "Re: OT: Safe Riddles"
- Previous message: Parse Tree: "Re: OT: Safe Riddles"
- In reply to: Parse Tree: "Re: OT: Safe Riddles"
- Next in thread: Phoenix: "Re: OT: Safe Riddles"
- Reply: Phoenix: "Re: OT: Safe Riddles"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 05:01:55 GMT
I'm really excited to be a part of this plan!
Pip
"Parse Tree" <account@domain.extension> wrote in message
news:dCoDd.313734$2W1.31303@news.easynews.com...
> Hmmm... Cat's are already very powerful creatures, and we would in
> effect be increasing their power by a hundred fold!
>
> This would alter the face of the planet. Let's do it!
>
> Blessed Butt.
>
> Pip wrote:
> > I dunno, with a lighter, you could make it a fire breathing cat.....rubs
> > hands.....we'd be RICH selling them.
> > Pip
> > "Parse Tree" <account@domain.extension> wrote in message
> > news:ZvoDd.312145$O24.48620@news.easynews.com...
> >
> >>They're for cat farts. You could probably use a synthetic asshat to keep
> >>the cat fart inside the cat, but I imagine it would be gross if it ever
> >>managed to make it's way up through the cat's mouth.
> >>
> >>Pip wrote:
> >>
> >>>I thought you had jars for that.
> >>>Pip
> >>>"Parse Tree" <account@domain.extension> wrote in message
> >>>news:L5oDd.311759$lR6.54125@news.easynews.com...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>They need to be synthetic to keep the energy in.
> >>>>
> >>>>Phoenix wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> /\\|//\
> >>>>> / o ^ o\
> >>>>>~oO=====Oo~.... Hahahaaaarrrr..It is I!.. syntetic cluepons?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>"Parse Tree" <account@domain.extension> wrote in message
> >>>>>news:xamDd.302957$O24.51663@news.easynews.com...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>These asshats need cluepons.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Rhyanon wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Eggzaktly!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>"Parse Tree" <account@domain.extension> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>news:zP1Dd.252385$O24.43690@news.easynews.com...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Ed Murphy wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:06:32 -0600, Rhyanon wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Top posting rocks; one can conveniently folow up a reply, at
least
> >>>>>>>>>>for
> >>>>>>>>>>someone actually has the mental acumen to keep track of what's
> >>>>>>>>>>being
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>said.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>Convenient != appropriate.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>You need to justify bottom posting with something. If all other
> >>>>>>>>things
> >>>>>>>>are equal, and top posting is more convenient, then it is
> >
> > necessarily
> >
> >>>>>>>>more appropriate.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Easier to top post without scrolling through five hundred lines
> >
> > of
> >
> >>>>>>>>>>rehash.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>Failure to trim quoted material is the real problem, and bottom
> >>>>>>>>>posting
> >>>>>>>>>is not much better than top posting (especially when combined
with
> >>>>>>>>>failure to trim).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>it is easier to trim quoted material with top posting over that of
> >>>>>>>>bottom posting. That's another advantage it has. With top posting,
> >
> > it
> >
> >>>>>>>>get's muddied trying to look through the attributions so that
there
> >>>>>>>>is
> >>>>>>>>only a certain depth of quoted material. With top posting, the
> >>>>>>>>attribution is directly above the material quoted from that
message,
> >>>>>>>>so
> >>>>>>>>it's very easy to trim.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>Interleaving replies amongst trimmed material is
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>appropriate.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>It is only appropriate because most posters (myself included) are
> >>>>>>>>lazy,
> >>>>>>>>and prefer interleaving to creating multiple posts in response.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>
> >
> >
- Next message: Phoenix: "Re: OT: Safe Riddles"
- Previous message: Parse Tree: "Re: OT: Safe Riddles"
- In reply to: Parse Tree: "Re: OT: Safe Riddles"
- Next in thread: Phoenix: "Re: OT: Safe Riddles"
- Reply: Phoenix: "Re: OT: Safe Riddles"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|