Re: Peterson's Death Sentence
From: John Woodgate (jmw_at_jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk)
Date: 01/24/05
- Next message: Cardinal Fang: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Previous message: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- In reply to: Winfield Hill: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Next in thread: Noah Roberts: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:15:43 +0000
I read in sci.electronics.design that Winfield Hill <hill_a@t_rowland-
dotties-harvard-dot.s-edu> wrote (in <ct1ap801lrc@drn.newsguy.com>)
about 'Peterson's Death Sentence', on Sun, 23 Jan 2005:
>John Woodgate wrote...
>>
>> I don't think you CAN mistreat an electron. You would need to present
>> some damaged or worn-out ones to convince me. (;-)
>
> In a college experiment I used to annihilate them with positrons;
> that should qualify.
>
>
You have been reported to the United Nations Authority for the
Protection of Fundamental Particles. Positrons are an endangered species
and find it difficult to survive in the modern environment.
-- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
- Next message: Cardinal Fang: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Previous message: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- In reply to: Winfield Hill: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Next in thread: Noah Roberts: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
