Re: Peterson's Death Sentence
From: John Woodgate (jmw_at_jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk)
Date: 01/30/05
- Next message: John Fields: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Previous message: John Woodgate: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- In reply to: Willem: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Next in thread: John Fields: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 22:41:19 +0000
I read in sci.electronics.design that Willem <willem@stack.nl> wrote (in
<slrncvqn20.26e.willem@toad.stack.nl>) about 'Peterson's Death
Sentence', on Sun, 30 Jan 2005:
>Do you believe it is possible to argue without using logic ?
Have you ever spoken to a woman? (;-)
-- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
- Next message: John Fields: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Previous message: John Woodgate: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- In reply to: Willem: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Next in thread: John Fields: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading