Re: Bottleneck
From: Dan (dan_at_dontspammecauseidontlikit.com)
Date: 02/04/05
- Next message: -: "iptables block host name instead of ip address"
- Previous message: baruah: "Re: Bottleneck"
- In reply to: Dan: "Bottleneck"
- Next in thread: Randy Howard: "Re: Bottleneck"
- Reply: Randy Howard: "Re: Bottleneck"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 16:08:42 +0800
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 16:41:08 +0800, Dan
<dan@dontspammecauseidontlikit.com> wrote:
Thanks to all for the replies.
The NICs are only one link in the chain, and both are 100 Mbit, so
there should be no problem.
All of the packets passing through are processed and directed by the
kernel. I'm curious as to what a 166 Mz Pentium would be capable of
processing. I've done some download tests and seem to get near the
top speed. I've noticed that it tends to slow down part way into
large files, but it's hard to say what's causing this.
Dan
- Next message: -: "iptables block host name instead of ip address"
- Previous message: baruah: "Re: Bottleneck"
- In reply to: Dan: "Bottleneck"
- Next in thread: Randy Howard: "Re: Bottleneck"
- Reply: Randy Howard: "Re: Bottleneck"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
