Re: Linux Routing Woes
From: Sir Jackery (root_at_jackery.com)
Date: 03/07/05
- Previous message: Michael Heiming: "Re: Linux Routing Woes"
- In reply to: Jeff: "Linux Routing Woes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 22:01:12 -0800
On 6 Mar 2005, Jeff wrote:
> The following routing table is from my Solaris box (172.16.24.89):
>
> Routing Table: IPv4
> Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface
> -------------------- -------------------- ----- ----- ------ ---------
> 172.16.24.0 172.16.24.89 U 1 70 hme0
> 224.0.0.0 172.16.24.89 U 1 0 hme0
> default 172.16.24.100 UG 1 494
> 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 6 129 lo0
>
> I want to dublicate that configuration on my Linux box (SuSE) but I've
> encountered a proble. It keeps placing 0.0.0.0 for the host route:
>
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Mss Window Iface
> 172.16.24.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 eth0
> 224.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 U 40 0 eth0
> 0.0.0.0 172.16.24.100 0.0.0.0 UG 40 0 eth0
>
> I'm at wit's end. My route.conf on Linux has this entry:
> default 172.16.24.100
>
> I've tried adding the address and routes manually with ifconfig and
> route and I've tried to add them with SuSE's init.d scripts. No matter
> what, I'm left with that routing table. Any thoughts?
>
> Jeff
>
>
I don't have a solution to your problem (I can't figure out what exactly
your problem is (-: ).
I would just like to point out that you are comparing a "route" with a
"route -n"
Think of the word "default" as a hostname that resolves to 0.0.0.0. The
zeros in a net route refer to wildcards, so 0.0.0.0 would be *.*.*.*. To
compare routing tables type use the -n command to display your routing
table on your solaris box and then compare the two outputs.
-jackery
- Previous message: Michael Heiming: "Re: Linux Routing Woes"
- In reply to: Jeff: "Linux Routing Woes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|