Re: One or two switches?
From: mirek (mpezda_at_lanex.pl)
Date: 03/29/05
- Next message: VB: "Installing samba in suse 9.0"
- Previous message: Xous - Jose R. Negreira: "To vlan or not to vlan, that's the question"
- In reply to: Dominik Hofer: "One or two switches?"
- Next in thread: pizzy: "Re: One or two switches?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:45:57 +0200
Dominik Hofer wrote:
> 100Mbit internet connection.
>
> What would you prefer:
>
> One 1Gbit switch for everything.
>
> or
>
> One 100Mbit switch for external communication, and one 1Gbit switch for
> internal communication between the servers.
> (The servers are some apache, with share sessions over sharedance and
> data over nfs, a mysql-server, and a plb or pound load balancer)
>
> I'm shure the second option is a bit faster, but do you think it's worth
> the money?
In my opinion the second solution is more safe than first.
Let's imagine you experience a crash of 1Gb switch ... terrible. All
communication - external and internal - is dead.
- Next message: VB: "Installing samba in suse 9.0"
- Previous message: Xous - Jose R. Negreira: "To vlan or not to vlan, that's the question"
- In reply to: Dominik Hofer: "One or two switches?"
- Next in thread: pizzy: "Re: One or two switches?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|