Re: Windows NFS Services, Unix, and Linux

From: Matt Payton (mattpayton_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 03/31/05


Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 02:07:11 GMT

Steve wrote:
> We have a Windows NT server with Microsoft's Services for Unix installed. It
> was apparently easy to setup on the Windows side, but a Unix user had a lot
> of trouble mounting it and having read/write permissions on it. The Windows
> side didn't change and somehow the user resolved their end and is able to
> mount it and have read/write access. We tried to setup a Fedora Core3 to
> mount this same share and it mounts and provides read-only access. We're not
> completely sure the issue lies on the Linux/Unix side, but we've set it all
> up to mirror the working Unix setup. No luck though. Graphically, the mount
> is showing full permissions, but access is denied when writing, deleting,
> etc.
>
> So, we also have a Windows 2003 server and enabled a NFS share and services
> on it. We have the same read-only problem with both the Unix and Linux
> client. We've set it on the Windows said to complete unrestricted access,
> but still no good.

This is typically because the server and client can't work out username
mapping, so the client mounts the share with anonymous access, which is
read only.

>
> We have the same usernames and password in each environment, have done user
> name mapping, etc, etc

Double, and triple check your username mappings...

>
> Can anyone offer any ideas on this?

I ran into something similar when I was playing with Windows Services
for Unix about a year ago. I did get it resolved, but honestly I don't
remember exactly what the solution was...While there are some kind of
cool things with WSU, there was no compelling reason ( for us ) to keep
using it.

But, I do remember there was some useful info in the newsgroup/forum.
I'd check the link here :
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/sfu/support/default.asp
or see if your news server carries microsoft.public.servicesforunix.general

--
- Matt -


Relevant Pages

  • Re: My browser shuts down when attempting to view my website
    ... The Unix server vs. a Windows server issue is just a guess solution. ... Publisher sites don't work well in FF, so that isn't too viable either. ...
    (microsoft.public.publisher.webdesign)
  • RE: MS Services for UNIX 3.5
    ... by a SFU 3.5 server with no problems - performs as expected. ... 100Mbit LAN connection) but only between the SuperMicro unit and my XP ... both the ASUS and SuperMicro units can mount an exported ... properly mapping linux and windows user accounts. ...
    (RedHat)
  • RE: MS Services for UNIX 3.5
    ... I know that there's no corrupt package because I can mount an exported ... Server included to allow access to linux clients. ... properly mapping linux and windows user accounts. ...
    (RedHat)
  • RE: PCNFS
    ... I know that there's no corrupt package because I can mount an exported ... Server included to allow access to linux clients. ... properly mapping linux and windows user accounts. ...
    (RedHat)
  • Re: Are you truly a M$ desktop alternative?
    ... Of course I'd rather update a single server ... multiple Microsoft patches etc. can be avoided. ... Our users range from Windows NT ... on unix you are not as limited in vendor options as you ...
    (freebsd-questions)