Re: simple question about ip_forward and NAT routing.
From: meneg (nospamage_at_nospamage.org)
Date: 03/31/05
- Next message: Patrick Klos: "SPAM: Lexington, KY ** NOT SPAM **"
- Previous message: linuxnooby: "Re: measure throughput?"
- In reply to: Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez: "Re: simple question about ip_forward and NAT routing."
- Next in thread: Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez: "Re: simple question about ip_forward and NAT routing."
- Reply: Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez: "Re: simple question about ip_forward and NAT routing."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 06:16:47 +0300
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:36:31 +0200, Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez wrote:
thanks for the response, it's very helpfull.
about this..
> any machine that can route traffic to the server
forgive my ignorance, I'm only using the functionality to share an
internet connection with a laptop:p but which are the machines that can
"route traffic to the server"? that excludes the rest of the internet
or/and other subnets in the LAN?
- Next message: Patrick Klos: "SPAM: Lexington, KY ** NOT SPAM **"
- Previous message: linuxnooby: "Re: measure throughput?"
- In reply to: Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez: "Re: simple question about ip_forward and NAT routing."
- Next in thread: Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez: "Re: simple question about ip_forward and NAT routing."
- Reply: Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez: "Re: simple question about ip_forward and NAT routing."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]