Re: Classic DHCP over bridge problem
From: Todd Knarr (tknarr_at_silverglass.org)
Date: 04/16/05
- Next message: kamilla: "url error on intranet"
- Previous message: David Schwartz: "Re: Strange problem accessing Virgin.net servers"
- In reply to: Horst Knobloch: "Re: Classic DHCP over bridge problem"
- Next in thread: Horst Knobloch: "Re: Classic DHCP over bridge problem"
- Reply: Horst Knobloch: "Re: Classic DHCP over bridge problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 05:17:30 GMT
In comp.os.linux.networking <d3pm2t$sc4$1@ulysses.news.tiscali.de> Horst Knobloch <horschti2@gmx.de> wrote:
> Even if a bridge would do this (which it doesn't), it
> shouldn't confuse the DHCP server. The DHCP server
> looks into the DHCP request for processing and doesn't
> bother with the ethernet frame overhead.
How then would the DHCP server match on hardware address when the
DHCP request doesn't contain a filled-in hardware address field?
I know it can, so it's got to be looking at the Ethernet MAC
address on the incoming datagram.
> This should be the normal behavior but may be the
> XP bridging software behaves otherwise and processes
> the DHCP traffic in a more "creative" way.
A real hardware Ethernet bridge would retain the MAC address,
yes. This, however, is Windows doing the bridging. I'm not even
completely sure it's capable of transmitting with an arbitrary
MAC address as would be needed to be a real bridge.
-- death.net: because for some problems there's only one solution.
- Next message: kamilla: "url error on intranet"
- Previous message: David Schwartz: "Re: Strange problem accessing Virgin.net servers"
- In reply to: Horst Knobloch: "Re: Classic DHCP over bridge problem"
- Next in thread: Horst Knobloch: "Re: Classic DHCP over bridge problem"
- Reply: Horst Knobloch: "Re: Classic DHCP over bridge problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|