Re: security of IP address
From: James Carlson (james.d.carlson_at_sun.com)
Date: 05/03/05
- Next message: Vincent Jaussaud: "Re: packets with source ip 0.0.0.0"
- Previous message: Kim Ji WOok: "SSH Sudden Death Based Clustering System"
- In reply to: Vernon Schryver: "Re: security of IP address"
- Next in thread: Vernon Schryver: "Re: security of IP address"
- Reply: Vernon Schryver: "Re: security of IP address"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 03 May 2005 07:53:28 -0400
vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com (Vernon Schryver) writes:
> I'm not convinced. One thing about MAC addresses is that they are
> approximately globally unique, bu PCs with user passwords are not.
> You're unlikely to make users type passwords every time their systems
> need to renew a DHCP lease.
Perhaps.
> You'll probably instead let the password
> be saved on the disk and used as needed.
Or in RAM. I'm no UI designer, but I'd expect that losing password
state when the system is shut down (or is put to sleep) probably isn't
that big a deal. Even if it's lost after acquiring the DHCP lease, it
doesn't seem like that much of a problem to me: you just adjust the
lease to suit the tolerance of the user.
(And given the market success of the really wretched crash-every-few-
minutes and malware-hosting software that's out there, I'd say that
users apparently have great levels of tolerance for pain. ;-})
> That raises lots of issues,
> from someone who uses several desktop systems, all of which can
> authenticate themselves simultaneously as the same user, to
> misplaced laptops in evil hands.
Sure. I don't think you'd want to substitute it for strong
authentication at the application layer.
> DHCP authentication is good for preventing some largely innocent
> mistakes such as connecting to the wrong network. It's more about
> network hygiene than security.
I think the target market is essentially the same as that for PANA: a
minimal level of authentication necessary to connect to a hotel
network and the like. Not guarding the gate at Fort Knox.
(Though we're probably saying essentially the same thing ...)
-- James Carlson, KISS Network <james.d.carlson@sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.234W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.497N Fax +1 781 442 1677
- Next message: Vincent Jaussaud: "Re: packets with source ip 0.0.0.0"
- Previous message: Kim Ji WOok: "SSH Sudden Death Based Clustering System"
- In reply to: Vernon Schryver: "Re: security of IP address"
- Next in thread: Vernon Schryver: "Re: security of IP address"
- Reply: Vernon Schryver: "Re: security of IP address"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|