Re: HELP: NAT/Masquerading broken with 2.6.11 + pppoe (long)
From: Horst Knobloch (horschti2_at_gmx.de)
Date: 05/16/05
- Previous message: Michael Heiming: "Stats comp.os.linux.networking (last 7 days)"
- In reply to: Albrecht Dreß: "HELP: NAT/Masquerading broken with 2.6.11 + pppoe (long)"
- Next in thread: Albrecht Dreß: "Re: HELP: NAT/Masquerading broken with 2.6.11 + pppoe (long)"
- Reply: Albrecht Dreß: "Re: HELP: NAT/Masquerading broken with 2.6.11 + pppoe (long)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 00:15:45 +0200
Albrecht Dreß <albrecht.dress@arcor.de> wrote:
> I have a small home network looking as follows:
>
> 192.168.42.3
> ------------ ------
> | PMac G4 | | |---DSL Modem (ppp0)
> ISDN---|ippp0 eth0|---|Switch|---two computers, printer (192.168.42.x)
> ------------ ------
...
> Now the machines in my "local" net can still connect the G4 via eth0
> (e.g. ssh or dns; the dns runs a caching nameserver), and the G4 has full
> access to the internet, too. However, nat/masquerading from my local
> net via the G4 to the outside world fails. I stripped down my ipfilter
> config to a completely open one (see script below), but still had no
> success:
I would try to use for the pppoe connection a dedicated
eth-NIC to which the DSL modem is directly connected.
IIRC NICs with an IP address assigned are supposed to
cause problems when running PPPoE over it. I can't
remember the exact reasons, though and I had even
such a setup successfully running a long time ago.
However I would give it a try with a dedicated NIC.
They are very cheap nowadays and such a setup is
smarter anyway, since the broadcasts of your private
LAN are not bridged by DSL modem towards your ISP.
Ciao, Horst
-- »When pings go wrong (It hurts me too)« E.Clapton/E.James/P.Tscharn
- Previous message: Michael Heiming: "Stats comp.os.linux.networking (last 7 days)"
- In reply to: Albrecht Dreß: "HELP: NAT/Masquerading broken with 2.6.11 + pppoe (long)"
- Next in thread: Albrecht Dreß: "Re: HELP: NAT/Masquerading broken with 2.6.11 + pppoe (long)"
- Reply: Albrecht Dreß: "Re: HELP: NAT/Masquerading broken with 2.6.11 + pppoe (long)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|