Re: Is there any static ARP concept for static IP network?
From: Madan (mailtraffic_at_gmail.com)
Date: 05/19/05
- Next message: Jrtwine: "Very Capable Router for Restricting WWW Access?"
- Previous message: swoolley_at_adstelecom.com: "FC3/Kernel 2.6, Fast Switching, Transparent Proxy, Squid, WCCP Help!!!!!"
- In reply to: linux.lover2004_at_gmail.com: "Re: Is there any static ARP concept for static IP network?"
- Next in thread: Menno Duursma: "Re: Is there any static ARP concept for static IP network?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 18 May 2005 18:31:35 -0700
I think, the best way to deal with ARP flooding or ARP poisoning is to
put ur netmask(subnetting) to low as possible... i.e. 255.255.255.0 is
better than 255.255.0.0....as it reduces the arp broadcast range
considerably.... use the subnet to best suit your needs.
- Next message: Jrtwine: "Very Capable Router for Restricting WWW Access?"
- Previous message: swoolley_at_adstelecom.com: "FC3/Kernel 2.6, Fast Switching, Transparent Proxy, Squid, WCCP Help!!!!!"
- In reply to: linux.lover2004_at_gmail.com: "Re: Is there any static ARP concept for static IP network?"
- Next in thread: Menno Duursma: "Re: Is there any static ARP concept for static IP network?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
