Re: TCP Variants on Linux
From: white (white_at_infotechnics.net)
Date: 06/05/05
- Previous message: Moe Trin: "Re: Still can't connect - long post"
- In reply to: Lew Pitcher: "Re: TCP Variants on Linux"
- Next in thread: Andy Furniss: "Re: TCP Variants on Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 05:19:47 +0700
Lew Pitcher Wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Khaled wrote:
>
> Yes, and the Linux NET/x TCP/IP stack conforms to those standards.
> FWIW, the
> standards are the TCP/IP RFCs, not specific implementations.
>
>
> Nope. Not called TCP variants. Called RFCs.
>
>
> Any variation from or extension of the RFCs is not a "standard". Your
> initial
> post listed a number of "implementations", not "standards".
>
>
>
> In your terminology, /none/.
>
> Linux TCP/IP is built to the standards, not built to mimic any one
> particular
> implementation of BSD's TCP/IP stack.
>
> - --
> Lew Pitcher
>
> Master Codewright & JOAT-in-training | GPG public key available on
> request
> Registered Linux User #112576 (http://counter.li.org/)
> Slackware - Because I know what I'm doing.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFCoPXWagVFX4UWr64RAvtYAJ9h/QR8FzQYb7vCR8p1pPS3omvgSwCePAGP
> 8v0Vu+jIIY7iXCxk/sewcrQ=
> =kcBx
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
testtesttest
-- white
- Previous message: Moe Trin: "Re: Still can't connect - long post"
- In reply to: Lew Pitcher: "Re: TCP Variants on Linux"
- Next in thread: Andy Furniss: "Re: TCP Variants on Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
