Re: CPU load due to IP networking
From: jbl (levinjb_at_gmail.com)
Date: 06/22/05
- Next message: Michael Heiming: "Re: How to use iptables to forward Microsoft Exchange connections -- possibly with ssh?"
- Previous message: Bill Davidsen: "Re: NAT issue with iptable"
- In reply to: Unruh: "Re: CPU load due to IP networking"
- Next in thread: Vernon Schryver: "Re: CPU load due to IP networking"
- Reply: Vernon Schryver: "Re: CPU load due to IP networking"
- Reply: Rick Jones: "Re: CPU load due to IP networking"
- Reply: Tom Anderson: "Re: CPU load due to IP networking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 22 Jun 2005 10:12:42 -0700
Unruh wrote:
> "jbl" <levinjb@gmail.com> writes:
> >I'm looking for some data on the approximate resource cost,
> >particularly CPU usage cost, of doing networking in a typical system,
> >in particular a Unix-like system (linux is a suitable example) and
> >vxworks (hence the crossposting).
>
> This is an extremely ill defined question. It will depend on exactly how
> the driver is written, how the driver is accessed by the software, etc.
This is why I'm interested only in rough estimates -- I should perhaps
have added examples.
> >I hope it's clear enough what kind of data I'm looking for, and that I
> >only need rough numbers. If anyone knows of something of this sort
> >that's been published, for any operating system, actually, I'd
> >appreciate a pointer.
>
> The numbers you are liable to get will be so rough that you could guess
> them just as profitably.
>
> Maybe if y ou told us the problem you are trying to solve, you would get
> better answers.
I'm trying to provide some guideliens for system engineers in an
environment where a CPU is already loaded a certain amount doing
control and telemetry with no internetworking within some allocation
(such as, say, 75%) of available CPU bandwidth. In this case it is
difficult to say "throw more bandwidth at it" because high speed
processors designed for this environment (radiation hardened) are not
yet available. An alternative, adding a new processor to handle
network and/or router functions, has substantial cost in increased
complexity, power and space required. Sorry to be so vague about this.
I realize that the most reasonable way to answer this question may in
fact be "build it and do the measurements".
/JBL
- Next message: Michael Heiming: "Re: How to use iptables to forward Microsoft Exchange connections -- possibly with ssh?"
- Previous message: Bill Davidsen: "Re: NAT issue with iptable"
- In reply to: Unruh: "Re: CPU load due to IP networking"
- Next in thread: Vernon Schryver: "Re: CPU load due to IP networking"
- Reply: Vernon Schryver: "Re: CPU load due to IP networking"
- Reply: Rick Jones: "Re: CPU load due to IP networking"
- Reply: Tom Anderson: "Re: CPU load due to IP networking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|