Re: iptables - how would you do this?
martin.woolley_at_misys.com
Date: 07/06/05
- Next message: ceyong_at_gmail.com: "Routing with Hub/Switch"
- Previous message: hawat.thufir_at_gmail.com: "Re: Destination host unreachable."
- In reply to: SEND NO SPAM: "Re: iptables - how would you do this?"
- Next in thread: Dale Dellutri: "Re: iptables - how would you do this?"
- Reply: Dale Dellutri: "Re: iptables - how would you do this?"
- Reply: SEND NO SPAM: "Re: iptables - how would you do this?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 6 Jul 2005 00:38:53 -0700
> set the default policy to drop (which you should do anyways)
We tried that and nothing would work, ie we couldn't even log into the
box let alone get our thin clients to come up.
> Your rule is droping all "udp" packets to ports 67 & 68 not rejecting them.
Clearly it isn't, as i/p addresses are still being issued by the
machine.
> Why are you even using dhcp if you are only accepting 6 connections ???
Obviously we have many more than six connections; this is just a snip
from our iptables. AFAIK a thin client must issue a DCHP request
otherwise TFTP won't deliver a kernel to the client.
-- Regards Martin Woolley ICT Support Handsworth Grammar School Isis Astarte Diana Hecate Demeter Kali Inanna
- Next message: ceyong_at_gmail.com: "Routing with Hub/Switch"
- Previous message: hawat.thufir_at_gmail.com: "Re: Destination host unreachable."
- In reply to: SEND NO SPAM: "Re: iptables - how would you do this?"
- Next in thread: Dale Dellutri: "Re: iptables - how would you do this?"
- Reply: Dale Dellutri: "Re: iptables - how would you do this?"
- Reply: SEND NO SPAM: "Re: iptables - how would you do this?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|