Re: Linux a worse router than Windows?
noelbush_at_gmail.com
Date: 09/09/05
- Next message: Dan N: "Re: questions about router and gateway"
- Previous message: Llanzlan Klazmon: "Re: ip address redirect with iptables"
- In reply to: Olivier: "Re: Linux a worse router than Windows?"
- Next in thread: noelbush_at_gmail.com: "Re: Linux a worse router than Windows?"
- Reply: noelbush_at_gmail.com: "Re: Linux a worse router than Windows?"
- Reply: SEND NO SPAM: "Re: Linux a worse router than Windows?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 8 Sep 2005 19:29:03 -0700
Thanks -- I checked, but all PPP is already disabled.
Is it possible that Windows XP has some special automatic configuration
for dialup connections that makes it work better? Just now I tried this
with a borrowed Windows 2000 machine, and got similarly bad results. So
it seems that XP has a leg up on everybody for making best use of a
dialup connection, or at least for the way it shares it. But what could
that be? Please help, I'm a networking nincompoop, but I need my IP
phone!
- Next message: Dan N: "Re: questions about router and gateway"
- Previous message: Llanzlan Klazmon: "Re: ip address redirect with iptables"
- In reply to: Olivier: "Re: Linux a worse router than Windows?"
- Next in thread: noelbush_at_gmail.com: "Re: Linux a worse router than Windows?"
- Reply: noelbush_at_gmail.com: "Re: Linux a worse router than Windows?"
- Reply: SEND NO SPAM: "Re: Linux a worse router than Windows?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading