Re: Linux a worse router than Windows?
From: SEND NO SPAM (spam_at_dodgeit.com)
Date: 09/09/05
- Previous message: noelbush_at_gmail.com: "Re: Linux a worse router than Windows?"
- In reply to: noelbush_at_gmail.com: "Re: Linux a worse router than Windows?"
- Next in thread: tobias_at_itservices.co.mz: "Re: Linux a worse router than Windows?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 06:00:25 GMT
noelbush@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks -- I checked, but all PPP is already disabled.
>
> Is it possible that Windows XP has some special automatic configuration
> for dialup connections that makes it work better? Just now I tried this
> with a borrowed Windows 2000 machine, and got similarly bad results. So
> it seems that XP has a leg up on everybody for making best use of a
> dialup connection, or at least for the way it shares it. But what could
> that be? Please help, I'm a networking nincompoop, but I need my IP
> phone!
>
I would suspect the xp machine was just a faster machine
Remember it's a "WINMODEM" not a real modem .. it's software driven
may just be better/newer drivers in Xp
Your trying to compare different cpu's with different hardware and
equate it to a operating system problem
Which by the way Your using 3 different operating systems for comparison.
- Previous message: noelbush_at_gmail.com: "Re: Linux a worse router than Windows?"
- In reply to: noelbush_at_gmail.com: "Re: Linux a worse router than Windows?"
- Next in thread: tobias_at_itservices.co.mz: "Re: Linux a worse router than Windows?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|