Re: ip_conntrack garbage
- From: Jim Garrison <jhg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:52:16 -0600
Grant wrote:
Aren't these supposed to go away after a while? They've been in the conntrack table now for about 22 hours.
That's okay, just over four days to go ;-)
So [UNREPLIED] is considered equivalent to [ESTABLISHED] and uses the ip_conntrack_tcp_timeout_established timer?
Just curious, but why isn't the syn_sent timeout (120 sec) used? .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ip_conntrack garbage
- From: Grant
- Re: ip_conntrack garbage
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: ip_conntrack garbage
- References:
- ip_conntrack garbage
- From: Jim Garrison
- Re: ip_conntrack garbage
- From: Grant
- ip_conntrack garbage
- Prev by Date: Re: ip_conntrack garbage
- Next by Date: Re: ip_conntrack garbage
- Previous by thread: Re: ip_conntrack garbage
- Next by thread: Re: ip_conntrack garbage
- Index(es):