Re: route command and non-local gateways
- From: "prg" <rdgentry1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Jan 2006 11:45:29 -0800
StivH wrote:
> Route propogation is the issue that concerns me. The OSPF and BGP setup
> with in the network is large and I do not have full visibility of it,
> so I simply do not want to be injecting routes into it. Yes, I can
> exercise some control over the redistribution of that route (eg on GW1,
> it may be that I just don't need to redist statics into OSPF - I
> haven't checked yet). The thing is, this is a requirement for a single
> user accessing a single application - I've got 500 other users on this
> site alone (and then there;s a global WAN which is out of my sphere of
> influence), so I don't want to start implementing a solution to 1
> person's problem which at some point down the line causes 500 other
> people a problem. Hence, I was looking for the solution which has the
> most limited scope. I saw in man route the remark that I previously
> posted regarding "the specified gateway must be reachable". To me, if
> the specified gateway is on a net that is already in the WS's route
> table, then it's reachable. ...
I ran into this myself years ago. After all, route is an IP tool. You
would think that they mean "reachable" in the IP sense.
But, noooooo ...
They mean link layer reachability, ie., the GW must be on the local
wire. When you think about it, it makes sense as this would be
required for ARP to work.
> ... I thought this would be a nice clean
> solution, but obviously it's not going to be. I think I'll have to move
> WS1 (which will give me a problem when FW1 is removed later this year,
> but I'll cross that bridge later!
good luck,
prg
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: route command and non-local gateways
- From: StivH
- Re: route command and non-local gateways
- References:
- route command and non-local gateways
- From: StivH
- Re: route command and non-local gateways
- From: Trygve Selmer
- Re: route command and non-local gateways
- From: StivH
- Re: route command and non-local gateways
- From: prg
- Re: route command and non-local gateways
- From: StivH
- route command and non-local gateways
- Prev by Date: Re: Realtek8139 problem under SuSE 9.2
- Next by Date: nis question pertaining to nis and hosts
- Previous by thread: Re: route command and non-local gateways
- Next by thread: Re: route command and non-local gateways
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|