Re: Neighbor table overflow. Virus?
- From: ibuprofin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Moe Trin)
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:59:36 -0600
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.networking, in
article <iwwBf.379$K27.54@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tauno Voipio wrote:
>The PPP client can imagine being a part of the local Ethernet
>subnet, if the PPP router is using proxy ARP.
I'm really not sure what you are trying to say here. For a dialup, the
peer that is dialing in has no concept of ARP - it's not even part of
the protocol. The function of the 'proxyarp' option to ANU ppp is to
add the "remote" IP address to the arp cache along with the MAC address
of "local" system. As ppp is a peer to peer protocol, there can be a
maximum number of such addresses - the O/P stated this server had ten
dialin lines, which adds just ten IP addresses. For an ISP type of
operation (clients on dialin accessing the Internet), proxyarp would
be a normal mode unless the server is masquerading.
Old guy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Neighbor table overflow. Virus?
- From: Tauno Voipio
- Re: Neighbor table overflow. Virus?
- References:
- Neighbor table overflow. Virus?
- From: nsa.usa@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Neighbor table overflow. Virus?
- From: Rick Moen
- Re: Neighbor table overflow. Virus?
- From: nsa.usa@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Neighbor table overflow. Virus?
- From: Rick Moen
- Re: Neighbor table overflow. Virus?
- From: nsa.usa@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Neighbor table overflow. Virus?
- From: Moe Trin
- Re: Neighbor table overflow. Virus?
- From: Tauno Voipio
- Neighbor table overflow. Virus?
- Prev by Date: Anyone can help me for more secure. firewall.
- Next by Date: Re: Desktop Firewall or Application-Packetfilter
- Previous by thread: Re: Neighbor table overflow. Virus?
- Next by thread: Re: Neighbor table overflow. Virus?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|