Re: Loosing UDP packets...
- From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 01:19:06 GMT
googlegroups@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Still, as a practical matter, Linux tends to drop my data on its way
out of the box. Silently spilling data off the top of a full socket
buffer is particularly annoying. It's dropping the OP's data too.
For non-blocking, does data ever actually queue in the socket buffer
under Linux?
I didn't mean to start a religious battle. I mentioned Solaris only
because it's the other main platform where I support those
applications, and It's been so much nicer to my data.
I wasn't tweaking on Solaris, just the absolute assertion :)
rick jones
--
a wide gulf separates "what if" from "if only"
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :)
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Loosing UDP packets...
- From: googlegroups
- Re: Loosing UDP packets...
- References:
- Re: Loosing UDP packets...
- From: Phil Frisbie, Jr.
- Re: Loosing UDP packets...
- From: Paul Black
- Re: Loosing UDP packets...
- From: googlegroups
- Re: Loosing UDP packets...
- From: Rick Jones
- Re: Loosing UDP packets...
- From: googlegroups
- Re: Loosing UDP packets...
- Prev by Date: Re: prog for scanning used ports
- Next by Date: Re: beginner networking question (fixed versus dynamic IP)
- Previous by thread: Re: Loosing UDP packets...
- Next by thread: Re: Loosing UDP packets...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|