Re: help on broadcast data lost in linux tcp/ip stack
- From: "Maxim Yegorushkin" <maxim.yegorushkin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Apr 2006 04:25:29 -0700
Zhang Huan wrote:
Maxim Yegorushkin wrote:
Zhang Huan wrote:yes, but not for broadcast or multicast packets, see the kernel code
i have a server, which broadcast data to a client. in the client,
there're two processes waiting on the same port,
Port identifies a process. Only one process is ever likely to receive
data for the same port.
udp_rcv() in net/ip4/udp.c
Sorry, my mistake.
with SO_REUSEADDR set,
You misunderstand the purpose of SO_REUSEADDR. It is intended for TCP
servers doing active close only. Read man ip(7).
it is also intended for UDP with broadcasting or multicasting.
Could you point me to the source of this information?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: help on broadcast data lost in linux tcp/ip stack
- From: Zhang Huan
- Re: help on broadcast data lost in linux tcp/ip stack
- References:
- help on broadcast data lost in linux tcp/ip stack
- From: Zhang Huan
- Re: help on broadcast data lost in linux tcp/ip stack
- From: Maxim Yegorushkin
- Re: help on broadcast data lost in linux tcp/ip stack
- From: Zhang Huan
- help on broadcast data lost in linux tcp/ip stack
- Prev by Date: NIS with compat mode
- Next by Date: Strange problems with ftp
- Previous by thread: Re: help on broadcast data lost in linux tcp/ip stack
- Next by thread: Re: help on broadcast data lost in linux tcp/ip stack
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
