Re: Proxy ARP with Linux
- From: "Tom" <tomlobato@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Apr 2006 05:59:16 -0700
"buck" <buck@xxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu na mensagem
news:50d05219lpc9laluhpus8dutf9c51jvfcn@xxxxxxxxxx
I don't think much of either of your diagrams, and you really have not
given enough information for a good answer. From what I see, you just
need the external interface to have IPs .129 and .130 (alias). What
is not clear is why you need anything other than the correct netmask
for the internal IF.
my internal netmask é 24bits.
buck
My Linux server (eth0=10.0.0.130; eth1=192.168.0.1) is connected to
internet via cisco router (10.0.0.129) and to Lan via eth1. I just want
to connect a machine to the Lan switch (so, it will physically access
eth1, internal IF) and configure it to IP 10.0.0.131, as it were in the
external segment.
Internet ------ | eth0-LINUX-eth1 | ------LAN
10.0.0.128/26 192.168.0.0/24
alias:
eth1:0 = 10.0.0.130
Is these routes right?
ip route del 10.0.0.128/26 dev eth0
ip route del 10.0.0.128/26 dev eth1
ip route add 10.0.0.131 dev eth1
ip route add 10.0.0.128/26 dev eth0
Tom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proxy ARP with Linux
- From: Tom
- Re: Proxy ARP with Linux
- References:
- Proxy ARP with Linux
- From: Tom
- Proxy ARP with Linux
- Prev by Date: Re: Strange problems with ftp
- Next by Date: Re: Strange problems with ftp
- Previous by thread: Re: Proxy ARP with Linux
- Next by thread: Re: Proxy ARP with Linux
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|