Re: Terminal servers: which is better cyclades or cisco routers?
- From: Michael Heiming <michael+USENET@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 10:19:21 +0200
In comp.os.linux.networking Dennis <dennis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
peelmanu@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Can someone tell me the benefits of using cyclades as a terminal server
instead of cisco routers?
Why would you want to use a Router as a Terminal Server ??
Err. cisco although makes terminal server, which might be what
the OP has in mind.
Most cisco TS I'm aware of don't support ssh (might have
changed?) unlike cyclades, which is a big pro!
[..]
BTW to the OP
Since you might be new to usenet, this is *NOT* a groups.google
forum, even if it looks like this to you, please quote context:
"Google Groups users please read - Howto reply properly"
http://groups.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=14213
--
Michael Heiming (X-PGP-Sig > GPG-Key ID: EDD27B94)
mail: echo zvpunry@xxxxxxxxxx | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/'
#bofh excuse 99: SIMM crosstalk.
.
- References:
- Terminal servers: which is better cyclades or cisco routers?
- From: peelmanu@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Terminal servers: which is better cyclades or cisco routers?
- From: Dennis
- Terminal servers: which is better cyclades or cisco routers?
- Prev by Date: Re: Removing iptables rules
- Next by Date: Re: Home network. Both computers must be running. Why?
- Previous by thread: Re: Terminal servers: which is better cyclades or cisco routers?
- Next by thread: About send packet with BROADCAST addr? Who can help me.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
