Re: How Sticky Are CableModem AUPs?
- From: Dave Uhring <daveuhring@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:20:54 -0500
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:53:07 -0700, phaeton wrote:
I realize I'm the one breaking the rules and taking the risks, but I
would like to set up a small webserver at home. It will be very very
low bandwidth- mostly just to host small images like avatars and stuff
for a few forums I frequent. I will also like to have ftpd running on
it for the infrequent times of moving small files around (less than
2mb, in most cases) and also *maybe* sshd so I can use it to fiddle
with machines on my LAN. I understand the usual ports are blocked and
I know how to get around that.
Charter's network people are too stupid to block the "usual" ports.
[~]$ telnet mail.xxxxxxx.net 25
Trying 68.xx.xxx.5...
Connected to mail.xxxxxx.net.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 mail.xxxxxx.net ESMTP Sendmail 8.13.3/8.12.11; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:12:57 -0500 (CDT)
^]
telnet> quit
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How Sticky Are CableModem AUPs?
- From: phaeton
- Re: How Sticky Are CableModem AUPs?
- References:
- How Sticky Are CableModem AUPs?
- From: phaeton
- How Sticky Are CableModem AUPs?
- Prev by Date: Re: Failover router ?
- Next by Date: Re: How Sticky Are CableModem AUPs?
- Previous by thread: How Sticky Are CableModem AUPs?
- Next by thread: Re: How Sticky Are CableModem AUPs?
- Index(es):