Re: How Sticky Are CableModem AUPs?
- From: "ynotssor" <ynotssor@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 20:59:21 -0700
"David Schwartz" <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1156909558.538777.229070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have Charter Cablemodem access. Like most any broadband provider
they mention 'no webservers, no ftp servers, no gameservers" etc.
Just *how* closely do they watch this?
Why would you buy a service that offers terms that aren't what you
want?
If Charter offers a higher class of service that doesn't have these
restrictions, you're basically stealing.
That's rather a stretch of logic. More accurate to say that the OP would
simply be violating the TOS (Terms Of Service) and would find that service
discontinued at some point when the ISP's port scans or packet sniffers
detect such traffic {to|from} the subscriber, as will eventually happen
sooner or later.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How Sticky Are CableModem AUPs?
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: How Sticky Are CableModem AUPs?
- References:
- How Sticky Are CableModem AUPs?
- From: phaeton
- Re: How Sticky Are CableModem AUPs?
- From: David Schwartz
- How Sticky Are CableModem AUPs?
- Prev by Date: Re: tcpdump + IFS = no sense?
- Next by Date: Re: vnc client. RFB protocol version error
- Previous by thread: Re: How Sticky Are CableModem AUPs?
- Next by thread: Re: How Sticky Are CableModem AUPs?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|