Re: tunnel point to point vs physical point to point
- From: Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:16:27 +0200
Hello,
jasonsig a écrit :
If you have 2 systems on a point to point link you would address them
by a /30 block?
No, this would be a waste of address space.
When creating 'gre' tunnel you can use /32 for example
ip addr add 1.0.0.1 peer 1.0.0.2 dev mydev.
Correct. The local and remote addresses do not even have to be next to each other.
why can't /32 of arbitray addressing be used on a point to point
between 2 systems?
It can.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tunnel point to point vs physical point to point
- From: jasonsig
- Re: tunnel point to point vs physical point to point
- References:
- tunnel point to point vs physical point to point
- From: jasonsig
- tunnel point to point vs physical point to point
- Prev by Date: Re: Looking for a GUI terminal emulator for Linux
- Next by Date: Re: tunnel point to point vs physical point to point
- Previous by thread: tunnel point to point vs physical point to point
- Next by thread: Re: tunnel point to point vs physical point to point
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|