Re: How Sticky Are CableModem AUPs?


ynotssor wrote:

If Charter offers a higher class of service that doesn't have these
restrictions, you're basically stealing.

That's rather a stretch of logic. More accurate to say that the OP would
simply be violating the TOS (Terms Of Service) and would find that service
discontinued at some point when the ISP's port scans or packet sniffers
detect such traffic {to|from} the subscriber, as will eventually happen
sooner or later.

That is not a stretch at all. If you take something you didn't pay for,
you are stealing. If Charter charges an extra $9/month to run servers
and you run servers without paying them, you are stealing those
$9/month from them.

DS

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: How Sticky Are CableModem AUPs?
    ... would simply be violating the TOS and would find ... If Charter charges an extra $9/month to run servers ... and you run servers without paying them, you are stealing those ... in violation of their TOS, ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: How Sticky Are CableModem AUPs?
    ... If Charter charges an extra $9/month to run servers ... and you run servers without paying them, you are stealing those ... operating a server without paying the commercial premium charged by their ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)