Re: Prevent access to linux server when mac adress does not match ip adress



On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.networking, in
article <J0E1h.158093$Vr5.2622570@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kris houben wrote:

i am running a red hat 6.2 server which is used for internet ip traffic
measurement.

What possible reason do you have for using a six year old distribution that
has been unsupported for three and a half years?

All clients connected to this server get a ip adress through dhcp. To be
sure that every client keeps getting the smake ip adress when it connects
the dhcp server gives ip adresses to the client pc's based on their mac
adress. This works fine as long as the clients are not changing their ip
adress manualy.

Do you specifically need DHCP? Are the systems moving between this, and
other networks? That's the only conceivable reason for using DHCP.

Is there a way to prevent access to the linux server when the ip adress of a
certain client does not match the mac adress.

Lessee, 6.2 came out of box with 2.2.14-5.0, and was updated over it's three
year life ending with 2.2.24-6.2.3 - that would still be IPCHAINS as a
firewall, and I don't recall it having a MAC address module.

I suppose the easiest way would be to use a static ARP setup. 'man arp' and
look at the -s (better still, the -f) option. Obviously, this will ONLY
work where all hosts of concern are located on the same collision domain,
and no one is using proxyarp.

Old guy
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: dhcp client not receiving offer from server
    ... > But for some reason, the client never responds to that ... It works, however, if the mac address is not spoofed (ie. the ... other nic first? ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: Holub on getters/setters again
    ... There is, as far as I can see, no reason to have the ArrayList at ... >>before the client that uses it was written. ... And I knew I wanted to call foreach on it from the very beginning, ... whether the element already exists in that container. ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Holub on getters/setters again
    ... >before the client that uses it was written. ... When the servers implementation is running the show, ... And I knew I wanted to call foreach on it from the very beginning, ... The reason that I didn't implement foreach was that it is slightly tricky, ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Silly question of the day #2: Hosted e-mail vs. Exchange on SBS2003
    ... My second reason depends on the hosting company. ... When I last had hosted e-mail, the hosting company had an aggressive and undocumented spam control plan that caused me a lot of problems. ... why would it be a better idea to leave the e-mail with the current hosting company vs. moving to Exchange 2003 SP2 when we are moving a client to SBS2003? ... They are using various Clients (he does not know what they use...he *thinks* they use the web mail "client" provided by the Hosting Company) to access e-mail remotely. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Killing threads
    ... >>>the proces of serving a client for any reason, ... The server thread actually forks new ... > recover a thread that is taking too long for whatever reason. ...
    (comp.programming.threads)