Re: NAT to a broadcast addess using iptables?
- From: Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:18:25 +0100
news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx a écrit :
But, the magic packet can be sent to either the mac address of the
target or the broadcast ethernet address. As I planned for the latter,
I didn't think that ARP resolution is a problem.
Correct. This is the advantage of the IP directed broadcast address which is translated into the ethernet broadcast address without ARP resolution.
Hovever, if I
understand you correctly, there's no way to configure the router to
allow the directed subnet broadcast,
Indeed, I'm afraid no.
so you're saying that I'd have to
direct a packet to a specific IP address and use a static arp entry to
force the packet to go to a specific mac address?
Yes. You could also set the static ARP entry so that the chosen unicast IP address resolves into the broadcast ethernet address.
.
- References:
- NAT to a broadcast addess using iptables?
- From: news
- Re: NAT to a broadcast addess using iptables?
- From: Pascal Hambourg
- Re: NAT to a broadcast addess using iptables?
- From: news
- Re: NAT to a broadcast addess using iptables?
- From: Pascal Hambourg
- Re: NAT to a broadcast addess using iptables?
- From: news
- NAT to a broadcast addess using iptables?
- Prev by Date: Re: NAT to a broadcast addess using iptables?
- Next by Date: Re: How to set default gw not by route command in linux?
- Previous by thread: Re: NAT to a broadcast addess using iptables?
- Next by thread: Re: How to add a second DHCP server in a network to use PXE boot without conflict with the first one ?
- Index(es):