Re: route command baffles me.
- From: gl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Jay G. Scott)
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:35:55 +0000 (UTC)
In article <56qnkqF2aem2dU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
patrick <ptri.c.k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In news:eu9592$7e6$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Jay G. Scott <gl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
is there something equivalent to solaris' unplumb, so that
i can tell eth1 to drop dead? ie, w/o a reboot?
# /sbin/ifconfig eth1 down
when you do ifconfig -a under with eth1 down, it still shows
eth1. i want ifconfig -a to not show anything about eth1
at all. i've done down, and down doesn't do that.
if you unplumb on solaris, ifconfig -a won't mention it
at all.
i assume if i rename the ifup (or whatever it is) script
and reboot it'll go away.
Gee, what's the opposite of up?
down.
on solaris, i get along just fine.
I sincerely doubt that, given your proposed solutions to your troubles. May
I suggest a study of the use of the "man" command?
i've read the man pages.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553 gl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Head of Sun Support, Sr. Operating Systems Specialist
Applied Research Labs, Computer Science Div. S224
University of Texas at Austin
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: route command baffles me.
- From: Unruh
- Re: route command baffles me.
- From: CptDondo
- Re: route command baffles me.
- From: hemphill
- Re: route command baffles me.
- References:
- route command baffles me.
- From: Jay G. Scott
- Re: route command baffles me.
- From: patrick
- route command baffles me.
- Prev by Date: Re: Why does pppd (pppoe) go to 95% to 100% of CPU?
- Next by Date: Re: route command baffles me.
- Previous by thread: Re: route command baffles me.
- Next by thread: Re: route command baffles me.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|