Re: route command baffles me.
- From: CptDondo <yan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:50:34 -0800
Jay G. Scott wrote:
both physical interfaces are on the motherboard. i was hoping there would
be a way to have eth1 omitted from ifconfig -a output, since i only have a
text console at the moment and it would save me some typing and it would
be quicker to recognize that eth0 was set up as i wanted. i guessed,
wrongly, that there would be a way to do that. there isn't. i get it.
point made.
ifconfig eth0
will dump all the info for eth0
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: route command baffles me.
- From: Jay G. Scott
- Re: route command baffles me.
- From: hemphill
- Re: route command baffles me.
- References:
- route command baffles me.
- From: Jay G. Scott
- Re: route command baffles me.
- From: patrick
- Re: route command baffles me.
- From: Jay G. Scott
- Re: route command baffles me.
- From: CptDondo
- Re: route command baffles me.
- From: Jay G. Scott
- route command baffles me.
- Prev by Date: Re: route command baffles me.
- Next by Date: Re: route command baffles me.
- Previous by thread: Re: route command baffles me.
- Next by thread: Re: route command baffles me.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|