Re: ipv6 - 16 byte??
- From: David Schwartz <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 04:13:46 -0700
On Jul 6, 11:52 pm, "toni" <noso...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ipv4 it's a *little bit* too small (only approx 4.000.000.000 hosts... )
ipv6, 128 bit, approx
1.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000 hosts
1.000.000.000.000 <- this is a trillion
It'n only my opinion, or ipv6 is a little bit *expensive* and *wasteful*?
Everything in computer is logical... there's a logical in it too?
Efficiency has a cost. Sometimes it's better to take a bit of
inefficiency rather than pay the cost of efficiency. For example, with
128-bits, a computer needs to know only its network and its MAC
address to generate a unique address.
DS
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ipv6 - 16 byte??
- From: toni
- Re: ipv6 - 16 byte??
- References:
- ipv6 - 16 byte??
- From: toni
- ipv6 - 16 byte??
- Prev by Date: Re: Problems with two network cards on Debian Etch
- Next by Date: Re: Linux remote script
- Previous by thread: Re: ipv6 - 16 byte??
- Next by thread: Re: ipv6 - 16 byte??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|