Re: xinetd : Bad line received from identity server NO-USER
- From: ibuprofin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Moe Trin)
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:05:46 -0500
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.networking, in
article <46ea4bc8$0$14829$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gregoire Avot wrote:
I run an application on a 'mexico' computer, which rsh to many others
computers to run jobs, using rsh and rcp commands. All works fine, but
sometime, after hours of jobs and thousands of successful rsh and rcp
commands, the 'mexico' computer can't rsh to the 'rio' computer.
Wow - haven't seen rsh and rcp used in a long time. The fact that you
are also running NIS means you are aware there is virtually no security
in these protocols.
There is no particular event logged on the 'mexico' computer.
Not even an error message that the 'rsh' failed?
On the 'rio' computer, log message until the faulty rsh is :
Sep 13 20:07:41 rio xinetd[8572]: Bad line received from identity server
at 192.168.1.80: 563 , 514 : ERROR :NO-USER
(mexico computer is 192.168.1.80)
You'll have to look there - the identity server says that the user does
not exist.
'mexico' computer is a Linux Kernel 2.6.9-34 RedHat Enterprise 4, two
processor Opteron 246 and 16gb ram. My running application is 32bits.
How busy is it?
'rio' computer is a Linux Knerel 2.4.21-4 RedHat Enterprise3, one
processor Duron and 2gb ram.
while very old, it's probably not the cause of the problem.
And the Nis server is a Sun running Solaris 2.8. Nis server was recently
patched with the latest update because large amount of request crash the
ypserv service. Now it seems to work correctly.
None the less, that could be the problem. I'd run a packet sniffer to
see if NIS is the problem - the 'mexico' system being unable to get the
right identity tokens.
Old guy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: xinetd : Bad line received from identity server NO-USER
- From: Gregoire Avot
- Re: xinetd : Bad line received from identity server NO-USER
- References:
- xinetd : Bad line received from identity server NO-USER
- From: Gregoire Avot
- xinetd : Bad line received from identity server NO-USER
- Prev by Date: Re: Inverse ARP: is it supported by every host?
- Next by Date: Re: Best speed for file transfers?
- Previous by thread: xinetd : Bad line received from identity server NO-USER
- Next by thread: Re: xinetd : Bad line received from identity server NO-USER
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|