Re: Some progress with wpa_supplicant/madwifi
- From: Nexus7 <ac25kV@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 03:14:12 -0000
On Sep 24, 10:18 am, Ignoramus3778 <ignoramus3...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
It does. While I have not been able to do full isolation/elimination
testing, it seems that wpa_supplicant authenticates better (maybe even
every time) if I say "ifconfig eth0 down" prior to starting it. Which
seems weird, since it is great to be able to run a milti-homed
Apparently you have your own reasons for not using network-manager and
nm-applet (by purging the packages and reinstalling them), the reasons
for which are somewhere in the threads.
However, what you said above reminds me of something which may be
helpful. In the old days, one used `ifup wlan0` or similar, to bring
up the wireless connection (which in turn used dhcp-client, etc).
Since the days of network-manager and nm-applet, I see wpa_supplicant,
and not dhcp-client, etc. of old. In fact, the interfaces that network-
manager manages must not be in /etc/network/interfaces (where a
network that is to be ifconfig'ed must be specified).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Some progress with wpa_supplicant/madwifi
- From: Ignoramus30458
- Re: Some progress with wpa_supplicant/madwifi
- References:
- Some progress with wpa_supplicant/madwifi
- From: Ignoramus25943
- Re: Some progress with wpa_supplicant/madwifi
- From: Nexus7
- Re: Some progress with wpa_supplicant/madwifi
- From: Ignoramus11107
- Re: Some progress with wpa_supplicant/madwifi
- From: Unruh
- Re: Some progress with wpa_supplicant/madwifi
- From: Ignoramus3778
- Some progress with wpa_supplicant/madwifi
- Prev by Date: Re: tcpwrapper has problem
- Next by Date: Re: Some progress with wpa_supplicant/madwifi
- Previous by thread: Re: Some progress with wpa_supplicant/madwifi
- Next by thread: Re: Some progress with wpa_supplicant/madwifi
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
