Re: netfilter & SIP
- From: Balwinder S Dheeman <bsd.SANSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:16:16 +0530
On 09/28/2007 06:59 PM, Miss Terre wrote:
In article <87zlz7ylgt.fsf@xxxxxxxx>, Mark.Carroll@xxxxxxxxxx says...
Miss Terre <Miss@xxxxxx> writes:
is there a patch for netfilter regarding the SIP protocol (for telephonyWhat do you want the patch to do? What feature are you missing?
in VOIP).
It seems there is, but, I can not find it.
Any suggestions ?
(You know about things like CONFIG_IP_NF_SIP? If it's a NAT issue,
recent kernels have SIP-aware stuff, though I think the earlier attempts
were a bit flaky.)
Mark
Great !
This effectively concerns the NAT issue. How make a PC behind a linux
firewall with MASQUERADING working with X-lite ?
I'll dig this !
thanks a lot.
The X-lite and many other good SIP clients/servers can also use STUN for
traversing UDP datagrams/packets over NAT.
--
Dr Balwinder S "bsd" Dheeman Registered Linux User: #229709
Anu'z Linux@HOME Machines: #168573, 170593, 259192
Chandigarh, UT, 160062, India Gentoo, Fedora, Debian/FreeBSD/XP
Home: http://cto.homelinux.net/~bsd/ Visit: http://counter.li.org/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: netfilter & SIP
- From: Miss Terre
- Re: netfilter & SIP
- References:
- netfilter & SIP
- From: Miss Terre
- Re: netfilter & SIP
- From: Mark T.B. Carroll
- Re: netfilter & SIP
- From: Miss Terre
- netfilter & SIP
- Prev by Date: Re: A weird routing question.
- Next by Date: Re: netfilter & SIP
- Previous by thread: Re: netfilter & SIP
- Next by thread: Re: netfilter & SIP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|