Re: netfilter & SIP
- From: Miss Terre <Miss@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:02:51 +0200
In article <96dvs4x3dn.ln2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
bsd.SANSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
On 09/28/2007 06:59 PM, Miss Terre wrote:
In article <87zlz7ylgt.fsf@xxxxxxxx>, Mark.Carroll@xxxxxxxxxx says...
Miss Terre <Miss@xxxxxx> writes:
is there a patch for netfilter regarding the SIP protocol (for telephonyWhat do you want the patch to do? What feature are you missing?
in VOIP).
It seems there is, but, I can not find it.
Any suggestions ?
(You know about things like CONFIG_IP_NF_SIP? If it's a NAT issue,
recent kernels have SIP-aware stuff, though I think the earlier attempts
were a bit flaky.)
Mark
Great !
This effectively concerns the NAT issue. How make a PC behind a linux
firewall with MASQUERADING working with X-lite ?
I'll dig this !
thanks a lot.
The X-lite and many other good SIP clients/servers can also use STUN for
traversing UDP datagrams/packets over NAT.
My goal is to make X-lite (under windows, on a PC behind the firewall)
be able to work through the linux firewall, with no modification (as
possible) on the windows client.
Would STUN help for this ?
I must admit I didn't know STUN.
Regards
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: netfilter & SIP
- From: Balwinder S Dheeman
- Re: netfilter & SIP
- References:
- netfilter & SIP
- From: Miss Terre
- Re: netfilter & SIP
- From: Mark T.B. Carroll
- Re: netfilter & SIP
- From: Miss Terre
- Re: netfilter & SIP
- From: Balwinder S Dheeman
- netfilter & SIP
- Prev by Date: Re: netfilter & SIP
- Next by Date: Re: A weird routing question.
- Previous by thread: Re: netfilter & SIP
- Next by thread: Re: netfilter & SIP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|