Re: netfilter & SIP
- From: Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:54:53 +0200
Balwinder S Dheeman a écrit :
That's why people prefer STUN, which is much more mature compared to
netfilter.
What do you mean by "more mature" ? IMHO one cannot compare Netfilter and STUN, they are too different in their nature and purpose.
In some of the cases, where your SIP client and, or server
does not have STUN functionality, we may still use some independent STUN
client to discover our external IP and reconfigure the iptables accordingly.
What do you reconfigure in iptables exactly ?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: netfilter & SIP
- From: Balwinder S Dheeman
- Re: netfilter & SIP
- References:
- netfilter & SIP
- From: Miss Terre
- Re: netfilter & SIP
- From: Mark T.B. Carroll
- Re: netfilter & SIP
- From: Miss Terre
- Re: netfilter & SIP
- From: Balwinder S Dheeman
- Re: netfilter & SIP
- From: Miss Terre
- Re: netfilter & SIP
- From: Balwinder S Dheeman
- Re: netfilter & SIP
- From: Mark T.B. Carroll
- Re: netfilter & SIP
- From: Balwinder S Dheeman
- netfilter & SIP
- Prev by Date: Re: netfilter & SIP
- Next by Date: Re: IPTables not forwarding from public to private subnet.
- Previous by thread: Re: netfilter & SIP
- Next by thread: Re: netfilter & SIP
- Index(es):