Re: ARP packets usage
- From: ibuprofin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Moe Trin)
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:51:58 -0500
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.networking, in
article <1193265460.173380.238880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Philippe
Signoret wrote:
NOTE: Posting from groups.google.com (or some web-forums) dramatically
reduces the chance of your post being seen. Find a real news server.
I ran Ethereal and captures all packets for 1 minute and 49 seconds.
What network? What is on this network?
TCP 353 70.2%
UDP 15 3.0%
ICMP 13 2.6%
ARP 122 24.3%
Fairly quiet - but without knowing _what_ you are looking at, it is
difficult to say if this is normal or not. For example, if you
are looking at a DSL connection, you are not likely to see any
mono-cast traffic (traffic to/from a single IP address) that is not
directed at your host. But you will _PROBABLY_ see all _broadcast_
traffic, where the router/switch does not know if "you" are the
destination or not.
Is this a normal ARP packet percentage? It seems a bit high to me.
Not enough information. The other question is what operating system
are the hosts running? That may also have impact on the traffic.
Old guy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ARP packets usage
- From: Philippe Signoret
- Re: ARP packets usage
- From: goarilla
- Re: ARP packets usage
- References:
- ARP packets usage
- From: Philippe Signoret
- ARP packets usage
- Prev by Date: verisign certificate
- Next by Date: Re: Forbid URL : Prevent Fraud. Reject domain list
- Previous by thread: Re: ARP packets usage
- Next by thread: Re: ARP packets usage
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|