Re: verisign certificate
- From: David Schwartz <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:01:21 -0700
On Oct 29, 6:48 am, vertigo <tekn...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We do not want to have self signed certificate anymore because they could
not be trusted
(anybody can create such certificate).
I want to have 10 valid certificates. I want to be sure that our clients
around the
world will not be asked about untrusted certificate.
I fought it would be cheaper to buy one certificate for my CA than 10
certificates
for each server.
You may be able to save money one of two ways:
1) You may be able to obtain a "wildcard" certificate. If all the
servers are in the same domain, a "*.domain.com" certificate could be
used on all the servers. This has some security disadvantages.
2) You may be able to obtain multiple certificates in the same domain
at a discounted price. Once you prove you own "domain.com", you may be
able to use an expedited web interface at a fixed price to assign new,
unique certificates for multiple hosts inside that domain as needed.
However, since real certificates are available for around $20 these
days, just buying ten at that price may be the best deal.
DS
.
- References:
- verisign certificate
- From: vertigo
- Re: verisign certificate
- From: Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th
- Re: verisign certificate
- From: vertigo
- verisign certificate
- Prev by Date: Re: verisign certificate
- Next by Date: Re: linux ipv6 routing problem
- Previous by thread: Re: verisign certificate
- Next by thread: Weird Connection Problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
