Re: Is there any point to full host names in /etc/hosts ?
- From: Baho Utot <baho-utot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 15:54:24 -0500
David Brown wrote:
[putolin]
If you are using the hosts file to avoid web advertisements or other
sites you want to avoid, the hosts file generally contains a long list
of "127.0.0.1 ads.doubleclick.net" lines, with every line resolving to
the same IP address. Is there some problem with lists like that?
mvh.,
David
I have used that way as well, but the correct way would be to use like this
127.0.0.2 ads.doubleclick.net
127.0.0.3 ads.something.else.net
--
Dancin in the ruins tonight
Tayo'y Mga Pinoy
.
- References:
- Is there any point to full host names in /etc/hosts ?
- From: Rikishi 42
- Re: Is there any point to full host names in /etc/hosts ?
- From: Moe Trin
- Re: Is there any point to full host names in /etc/hosts ?
- From: David Brown
- Is there any point to full host names in /etc/hosts ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Uverse, anyone?
- Next by Date: Re: Uverse, anyone?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is there any point to full host names in /etc/hosts ?
- Next by thread: Re: Is there any point to full host names in /etc/hosts ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|