Re: PPPoE doesn't work
- From: Clifford Kite <kite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 20:47:18 -0600
Clifford Kite <kite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So I guess pppoe must ignore session frames that don't contain the peer
MAC from the -e option as the AC MAC. I hadn't thought of that.
And now that I read it I wish I hadn't thought of it. Session frames
from the peer should contain the local MAC as the AC MAC, said local
MAC being supplied by pppoe-server during discovery. Does pppoe use
the local MAC from the -e option as the AC MAC in frames it sends?
It appears to me that it should but I can't be sure.
--
Clifford Kite
.
- References:
- PPPoE doesn't work
- From: Bartlomiej F. Tajchman
- Re: PPPoE doesn't work
- From: Pascal Hambourg
- Re: PPPoE doesn't work
- From: Bartlomiej F. Tajchman
- Re: PPPoE doesn't work
- From: Clifford Kite
- Re: PPPoE doesn't work
- From: Pascal Hambourg
- Re: PPPoE doesn't work
- From: Clifford Kite
- Re: PPPoE doesn't work
- From: Pascal Hambourg
- Re: PPPoE doesn't work
- From: Clifford Kite
- PPPoE doesn't work
- Prev by Date: Re: Wireless security
- Next by Date: Re: Wireless security
- Previous by thread: Re: PPPoE doesn't work
- Next by thread: How to ignore the Record Route IP option?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|