Re: NFS mounts but ls says "Input/output error"



In article <87k5o1614g.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, wahjava@xxxxxxxxx
(Ashish Shukla) writes:

Charlie Gibbs writes:

rpcinfo on the server (Slackwar) gives the following:

program vers proto port
100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper
100000 2 udp 111 portmapper
100011 1 udp 975 rquotad
100011 2 udp 975 rquotad
100011 1 tcp 978 rquotad
100011 2 tcp 978 rquotad
100003 2 udp 2049 nfs
100003 2 tcp 2049 nfs
100021 1 udp 32770 nlockmgr
100021 3 udp 32770 nlockmgr
100021 1 tcp 32769 nlockmgr
100021 3 tcp 32769 nlockmgr
100005 1 udp 985 mountd
100005 1 tcp 988 mountd
100005 2 udp 985 mountd
100005 2 tcp 988 mountd
100005 3 udp 985 mountd
100005 3 tcp 988 mountd
100024 1 udp 993 status
100024 1 tcp 996 status

You're not running NFS version 3, but running version 2.

I presume you're taking that from the "nfs" lines above?

while rpcinfo on the client (KnoppMyth) says:

program vers proto port
100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper
100000 2 udp 111 portmapper
100021 1 udp 32768 nlockmgr
100021 3 udp 32768 nlockmgr
100021 4 udp 32768 nlockmgr
100021 1 tcp 36516 nlockmgr
100021 3 tcp 36516 nlockmgr
100021 4 tcp 36516 nlockmgr

On your client side, you don't have support for NFS version 2.

Here I presume you're looking at the "nlockmgr" lines.

I've googled and checked man pages, but I can't find any
discussion of NFS version and compatibility issues. Are
my two boxes incompatible? (I hope not - it would be a
surprising and disappointing departure from the high degree
of compatibility I've come to take for granted from Linux,
and TCP/IP in general.)

Where do I go from here? Do I have to install another version of
Linux on one or both boxes? Do I have to find modules and rebuild
one or both kernels? Or are there some undocumented parameters I
have to tweak? (Charlie's First Law of Documentation states that
if you can't find it in the documentation, it isn't documented.)

--
/~\ cgibbs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Charlie Gibbs)
\ / I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way.
X Top-posted messages will probably be ignored. See RFC1855.
/ \ HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored. Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!

.



Relevant Pages

  • Urgent help with Secure NFS.
    ... have that option - I'm just attempting to tunnel all NFS traffic to the ... 100000 4 tcp 111 rpcbind ... 100000 4 udp 111 rpcbind ... 100021 1 tcp 49153 nlockmgr ...
    (SSH)
  • mount: RPC: Program not registered
    ... Recently i deployed one NFS serverwith three clients, ... 100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper ... 100000 2 udp 111 portmapper ... 100021 1 udp 60364 nlockmgr ...
    (RedHat)
  • mount: RPC: Program not registered
    ... Recently i deployed one NFS serverwith three clients, two ... 100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper ... 100000 2 udp 111 portmapper ... 100021 1 udp 60364 nlockmgr ...
    (RedHat)
  • RE: mount: RPC: Program not registered
    ... Recently i deployed one NFS serverwith three clients, two ... 100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper ... 100000 2 udp 111 portmapper ... 100021 1 udp 60364 nlockmgr ...
    (RedHat)
  • mount: RPC: Program not registered
    ... Recently i deployed one NFS serverwith three clients, ... 100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper ... 100000 2 udp 111 portmapper ... 100021 1 udp 60364 nlockmgr ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)