Re: ppp sharing via NAT
- From: wahjava@xxxxxxxxx (Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल)
- Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 22:50:10 +0530
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
,--- Unruh writes:
| Fruehwirth@xxxxxxxxx writes:
|| Hello,
|| I want to use NAT to share a ppp Connection.
|| PC1 and PC2 are within a private Subnet connected via 4-Port Hub
|| (integrated within DSL-Modem).
|| PC1 is connected to DSL-Modem via eth0 and establishes PPP-
|| Connection.
|| PC2 is connected to private Subnet via eth0.
|| Is it possible to route Internet Packets from PC2 to PC1 (by setting
|| PC1 as Standard Gateway),
|| PC2 does NAT and forwards packets via ppp?
Did You mean to say, "PC1 does NAT and forwards packets via ppp?", hmm... ?
| Sure. Just do it.
| Make sure forwarding is enabled on PC1. Since you are already connected,
| the router itself is probably doing nat, so there is no need for you to do
| an extra nat ( in fact it would confuse everything).
I don't think in this case, DSL-Modem is acting as router. It is
acting as a bridge. So, OP has to masquerade on ppp interface:
# iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ppp+ -j MASQUERADE
TIA
- --
Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल http://wahjava.wordpress.com/
·-- ·- ···· ·--- ·- ···- ·- ·--·-· --· -- ·- ·· ·-·· ·-·-·- -·-· --- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHc97PHy+EEHYuXnQRAjn7AJ97z+CxB8QqVz5CzrzWlp+wrOr2ywCgkKGk
DlOlBlKSg+BLZ8joDc6ajOY=
=Gbk5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
- References:
- ppp sharing via NAT
- From: Fruehwirth
- Re: ppp sharing via NAT
- From: Unruh
- ppp sharing via NAT
- Prev by Date: Re: Help: rsh without password
- Next by Date: Re: Help: rsh without password
- Previous by thread: Re: ppp sharing via NAT
- Next by thread: Re: hosts.allow does not resolve names
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
