Re: ping (and others) fail above a certain size
- From: David Schwartz <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 21, 10:09 am, Unruh <unruh-s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nope, the problem is behind the keyboard. Why in the world are you sending
ping packets of that size?
Umm, what?! What's wrong with 2,953-byte ping packets? I routinely use
large pings to test fragmentation, reassembly, path MTU blackholes,
and the like. I don't think I'm alone.
(Mind you I agree that a crash is hardly the right response from ping)
Umm, what?! Ping didn't crash. It continued all the way to the end and
wrote out its statistics.
Congratulations on a completely useless reply. ;)
DS
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ping (and others) fail above a certain size
- From: Guillaume Dargaud
- Re: ping (and others) fail above a certain size
- References:
- ping (and others) fail above a certain size
- From: Guillaume Dargaud
- Re: ping (and others) fail above a certain size
- From: Unruh
- ping (and others) fail above a certain size
- Prev by Date: Re: When IPv6?
- Next by Date: comp.os.linux.networking charter
- Previous by thread: Re: ping (and others) fail above a certain size
- Next by thread: Re: ping (and others) fail above a certain size
- Index(es):