Port 57 vs 587
- From: sb5309@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 03:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
At my office:
OK (out-going mail): telnet servername 25
OK: telnet servername 110
At my client's office:
No: telnet servername 25
OK: telnet servername 110
On advise of the web host, at client office change port 25 to 587:
OK: telnet servername 587
Question: Why is this so ?
Thanks.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Port 57 vs 587
- From: John Murtari
- Re: Port 57 vs 587
- Prev by Date: postfix rate limit
- Next by Date: Pictures conversion with ImageMagick
- Previous by thread: postfix rate limit
- Next by thread: Re: Port 57 vs 587
- Index(es):