Re: Port 57 vs 587
- From: John Murtari <jmurtari@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:40:10 -0400
sb5309@xxxxxxxxx writes:
At my office:
OK (out-going mail): telnet servername 25
OK: telnet servername 110
At my client's office:
No: telnet servername 25
OK: telnet servername 110
On advise of the web host, at client office change port 25 to 587:
OK: telnet servername 587
Question: Why is this so ?
I work at a web host, we tell people to change to 587
in cases where their ISP blocks port 25 connections attempting
to leave their network, i.e. they are trying to stop spammers.
--
John
___________________________________________________________________
John Murtari Software Workshop Inc.
jmurtari@following domain 315.635-1968(x-211) "TheBook.Com" (TM)
http://thebook.com/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Port 25 vs 587
- From: Andrew Gideon
- Re: Port 25 vs 587
- References:
- Port 57 vs 587
- From: sb5309
- Port 57 vs 587
- Prev by Date: Filter or change tcp packets
- Next by Date: Re: postfix rate limit
- Previous by thread: Port 57 vs 587
- Next by thread: Re: Port 25 vs 587
- Index(es):