192.168 - why?

why does *everybody* use 192.168.0.1, and not simpler 10.0.0.1?

imho, 192.168 and 172.16 is unuseful, and unnecessarily complicated


10.x.x.x = 16000000 hosts/networks

192.168.x.x = only 60000 hosts/nets

16000000 is not enough?


how can 192.168 and 182.16 increase? at least 1000000... at least 10%... nothing.


imho, 10.0.0.1 should be always the favourite


--
~
. .
/V\
/ \
/( )\
^'~'^
Un uomo è libero nel momento in cui desidera esserlo. (Voltaire)
.