Re: 192.168 - why?
- From: KR <kristian.rasmussen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:38:22 +0200
Antonio Macchi wrote:
why does *everybody* use 192.168.0.1, and not simpler 10.0.0.1?
They don't.
imho, 192.168 and 172.16 is unuseful, and unnecessarily complicated
Perhaps for someone who don't really understand IP adressing. And if that is the case, s/he probably shouldn't be messing with it in the first place.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 192.168 - why?
- From: Antonio Macchi
- Re: 192.168 - why?
- References:
- 192.168 - why?
- From: Antonio Macchi
- 192.168 - why?
- Prev by Date: 192.168 - why?
- Next by Date: Re: 192.168 - why?
- Previous by thread: 192.168 - why?
- Next by thread: Re: 192.168 - why?
- Index(es):
